So after finishing off “Party of Five”, I moved on to another series featuring Jennifer Love Hewitt, this time as the principal character, in “Ghost Whisperer”. Now, when I started the series I wasn’t sure what to make of it, and so wasn’t sure if I was going to enjoy it. I do like ghost stories, and the series premise is that Jennifer Love Hewitt’s character Melinda Gordon from her childhood can see ghosts like her grandmother could. However, the premise as described is that she uses her ability to help ghosts resolve their issues so that they can cross over, which suggests that it’s more a drama built around the relationships that the ghost has to other people than about telling actual ghost stories, which makes it, then, a similar sort of show as “Highway to Heaven” or “Touched By an Angel”, where the stories were in general aimed at sentimentalism and those sorts of emotions and the supernatural premise was just the frame to get at those stories, which isn’t something that I, right now, would seek out to watch and isn’t what I’m really looking for in my ghost stories. Then again, I at least watched the former while young and enjoyed it, so maybe this would turn out the be enjoyable anyway.
After watching the first season, I can clearly say that I like the show better than I liked “Party of Five”, and right now it’s a candidate to go into my closet of shows that I might regularly rewatch.
Now, I could say that that’s because the show tries to stick to its ghost story roots by trying to keep a lot of the hauntings creepy and so to maintain a creepy tone, but in actuality I think that that, at times, actually hurts the show, as the ghosts seem to go out of their way to scare her and others — including trying to harm people — who then end up simply talking things through with her. This leads to some of the ghosts seeming to be monumentally unsympathetic — one of them being a bride that was trying to drive her replacement insane, seemingly — and yet we’re supposed to be happy for them at the end when they cross over. That sort of thing worked a lot better when they had characters who had reason to be angry and had to deal with that before crossing over, but the best episode with that one was with a black ghost who was the victim of racism, and that one worked mostly because it was a really good examination of racism, where the racism clearly happened, the person responsible — not the person who killed him, but the judge who as a prosecutor didn’t seek a sentence for the guy who did — does profusely apologize for it, but the key issue was that the ghost and his son because of that argued to separate the races and to not trust white people, and so they had to resolve those feelings while having good reason to have them, even if those feelings would still be an overreaction. They could have easily made Melinda have some unconscious racism himself, but instead her black partner Andrea talks to the grandson who is absorbing the lessons from his father and points out that Melinda is good, and they don’t invent something for Melinda to be racist over but instead keep her pretty much “clean”, which makes it less annoying. So it’s a good example of a message show about racism and about how they can have an aggressive and threatening ghost but still make them sympathetic enough that we are happy about their happy ending. Still, the best episodes are the ones where the ghost is sympathetic from the start, and any creepiness in their approaches comes from their being confused about whether they are alive or dead or else not knowing how to impact the real world and so needed her to teach them how.
The show also dives a bit deeper into the supernatural and how it works than you’d expect from a show like this. Melinda comments or at least hypothesizes about how things work and how ghosts can impact the world, and what it means for someone to be haunted. The show also uses that to tell some interesting stories, such as one case where a ghost is trying to talk to Andrea but does so desperately, but it turns out that the reason for that rather creepy behaviour is because he’s actually on life support and can only do that when he crashes and is being revived (he wants to tell her where his brother is). Another case, in the two-part season finale, is where she’s seeing people from an airplane and they are talking about things and it turns out that the people on the plane are dead but the plane is still flying and they are trying to tell her about that. They also even set up a bit of a arc, with Melinda noting that the ghosts seem to be getting more aggressive and more powerful than she remembered (from before the series) and there’s a laughing ghost and a man in a hat that seem to have some kind of agenda that is hinted at but never revealed in the season (although the man in the hat is revealed and definitely has an interest or some plans for Melinda in the two-part finale).
The biggest weakness in the show, at least in the early part of the season, are the side stories. Now, in a show like this, having side stories is a good thing, as it can establish a bit of normality or let us get to know the principals outside of the main plot. However, in order for side stories to work they have to either be light and humourous to simply give us a break from the drama, or else they have to be tightly thematically tied to the main plot so that they all seem to flow together. But for almost all of the season, neither is the case. We get plots where Andrea becomes a partner in the antique shop, and where Melinda’s husband Jim’s mother comes to stay for a while, but those aren’t tied to the main plot, don’t add any interesting complications to the main plot, aren’t all that light or funny, and don’t really seem complete but also don’t set up any real complications or things for later episodes. The show, however, did manage to do this well in a couple of episodes. The first was one where while trying to help the ghost of a childhood friend move on — she died when Melinda was a child and is just crossing over now, because ghosts don’t have a sense of time — Melinda has to face her mother who always disparaged her ghost seeing abilities, tying the two plots together so that they interact with each other in interesting ways. The other is one where the side plot was trying to think of ways to help a ghost dog from a previous episode cross over, which was light and while it wasn’t complete it worked well enough and Melinda not being able to see the dog is a hint that something is going on in a later episode. But most of the side stories aren’t anywhere near that strong.
The other issue is that Jim, Melinda’s husband, is a character that I never liked and that I don’t think actually adds anything to the show. He worries about her when she goes out to help the ghosts, but he’s understanding and doesn’t get in her way. So he’s not a major obstacle for her to work around, but he’s not really a partner in her mission either. So all he gets to do is be worried and supportive, and then to be her husband, and that’s it. This might work if she could use him as a sounding board, but she already has one: her partner, Andrea. In fact, Andrea works so much better at that that, again, I really think they could drop the husband character entirely. There’s an episode that starts at a carnival with Jim doing the dunk tank and Andrea walking around with Melinda and the chemistry is so much better between Melinda and Andrea that it seems clear to me that she should be Melinda’s confidant, which leaves him out in the cold. The only time I really liked the character was in the two-part season finale where he’s running around doing the rescue work after the plane crashes, but all that means is that his character and actor might work well in a reboot of “Emergency!”, but not in this show.
Which means that the big twist of the two-part finale makes me sad. Andrea’s brother might have been on the plane that crashed, and so while things are going on she rushes off to try to find him, but then the plane crashes and Jim says that the bridges are closed so she’ll have to come right back, and she shows up a bit later. As the show progresses, Melinda needs to deal with someone who died who wasn’t on the plane, but was in a car near the crash and died as part of that. The show focuses on Andrea and Melinda trying to find out if Andrea’s brother was on the plane or not, with Andrea commenting that her brother hasn’t called her back, and the passenger manifest saying that it’s unknown if he was on-board or not. Melinda also says that she has something to tell Andrea but can’t get it out, and it’s only at the end that we realize that what she wanted to tell Andrea was not that she knew that her brother died, as the brother shows up at the end and walks right past Andrea. No, as it turns out, it was Andrea who died and is now a ghost walking around.
There are good and bad points to how this was done. The bad is that given how they under develop the side stories it ends up pretty much feeling like it came out of nowhere. It’s a twist, sure, but it feels like a twist that just happens without proper set-up, and so emotionally it falls a bit flat. However, this is belied by how in fact they actually hint at this a lot in that episode (the second of the two-parter). In addition to what I already mentioned, Melinda is very upset which we at first attribute to her empathy but can clearly be seen as being upset at losing her friend, and people who should talk to Andrea ignore her, but do so in ways that makes sense — one of them is an FAA agent who is obviously far more concerned with figuring out how Melinda knew about the plane before anyone else did than about helping Andrea find out about her brother — so at the time we don’t note it but in hindsight it is a clear sign that at that point she’s dead and a ghost. And I’m sure that if I rewatched the episode I’d find a few more hints, which is a wonderful thing for an episode to do.
That being said, it also means that the one side character in Melinda’s life that I liked is dead and should be crossing over soon and the side character that I didn’t like and didn’t think worked survived. I’m not sure if this was done as a creative decision or because the actress wanted to move on — I’ll have to see how they handle it at the start of Season 2, the main reason why I’m rushing to write this post (but not post it) before I start the second season — but I have to say that if this was a creative decision right now I don’t like it and think that they could have done that better if it was planned, but if it was a reaction to a real life issue with an actress who wanted to leave it’s actually a wonderful way to handle it. Basically, if this was planned they should have done it better, but if it was reactive and so done more on-the-fly then they managed to pack an awful lot into something that they weren’t planning on doing.
So far, the show is pretty entertaining. The season started decent with some rough spots but did seem to manage to hit its stride towards the end of the season. However, the dramatic season finale changed a lot of things and it will be interesting to see what they do with that in Season 2.
Thoughts on “The Two Gentlemen of Verona”
June 29, 2022The next Shakespeare play that I read was “The Two Gentlemen of Verona”. Another comedy, this one features, well, two gentlemen from Verona, Valentine and Proteus. Valentine is heading off to the city for some adventure and politicking, but Proteus can’t go because he’s wooing Julia. At first, she doesn’t care for him, but ultimately does come to love him after the advice of her servant. However, Proteus ends up being sent to the city anyway through so machinations, and once there finds out that despite his mocking Proteus for falling in love, Valentine has fallen in love with Silvia, but her father has promised her to someone else. Proteus then falls in love with Silvia as well and rats out Valentine who was trying to elope with her, which gets Valentine exiled from the city, and he falls in with some outlaws. Proteus’ attempts to woo Silvia get him nowhere, and she eventually arranges to run off to find Valentine. Julia, distraught from not hearing from Proteus, dresses as a man and goes to the city and finds out that Proteus is wooing Sylvia. Sylvia and her escort happen to get captured by the very outlaws that Valentine leads, and Proteus and company arrive to save her at right about that time. They get everything straightened out, and Valentine is set to marry Sylvia and Proteus is set to marry Julia, which is where the play ends.
I suppose the ultimate comment on how much I liked this comedy is that before writing this post I made sure that I looked to see if this play was really supposed to be a comedy. The plot isn’t really conducive to humour, at least not for me. I don’t find a friend trying to betray his friend so that he can woo a woman while forgetting about the woman he has already wooed and won particularly funny, and this is only made worse by the fact that at the end we are supposed to, I think, be happy for Julia that she manages to win him back. I’m just not really interested in laughing at someone that unsympathetic, especially since neither he nor Valentine nor Sylvia nor Julia are really comic characters. I’d make any one of them the straight person in any comedy, and the play focuses on them and has them play off of each other and other, more minor characters, none of which are all that comic characters either. So we don’t have normal characters playing off and getting frustrated by the oddities and idiocies of the people around them, or of the plot, and so it really comes across as a more straight plot with some comedy scenes and lines thrown in to make it a comedy.
That being said, Shakespeare’s gift for banter and dialogue is still on display here, but what I noticed in this play is that the only difference between his banter in the early comedies and his banter in the early tragedies is that he uses more puns in the comedies. Otherwise, the cadence and structure of the banter seems to be pretty much identical. You would think that I’d appreciate that given that in general I like puns, but the dialogue doesn’t really seem to settle on being either the mean-spirited punning banter of two rivals or the fun-spirited punning banter of people legitimately misunderstanding each other, and the cases where it does the former only make the overall play seem less comic than it could have been. As such, the play pretty much aligns with my impressions of his first comedy, “The Comedy of Errors”: well-written, but I don’t find it funny.
Next up is “Love’s Labour’s Lost”, so we’ll see what my impressions of that are after I read it.
Tags:Shakespeare
Posted in Books, Not-So-Casual Commentary, Theatre | Leave a Comment »